Understanding Romans 14
A Hebraic Lens on Common vs. Unclean

Romans 14 is often misunderstood, especially when it comes to food laws and the judgments within the early church. To truly grasp Paul’s message, we need to explore the cultural, historical, and linguistic context that shaped the beliefs of both Jewish and Gentile believers in the first century. This chapter is not about giving believers a free pass to eat anything they want, but rather about encouraging unity, maturity, and mutual respect within the body of Christ.

The Real Issue: Judgment, Not Diet

Romans 14 opens with Paul urging believers not to pass judgment on each other over their dietary preferences and the observance of special days. He addresses those who are “weak in faith,” referring to individuals who refrain from certain foods or hold specific days in high regard. Importantly, Paul is not dismissing their faith but is instead concerned with their immaturity, as they divide over these personal convictions.

Paul teaches that the stronger believer is one who understands that the kingdom of God is not about food or drink, but rather about righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit (Romans 14:17). He isn’t undermining dietary laws; he is emphasizing that love and faith should guide how we interact with others, especially when their convictions differ from ours.

Verse 14 and the Word “Unclean”: A Closer Look at the Greek

A pivotal verse in this discussion is Romans 14:14:
“I know and am convinced by the Lord Jesus that there is nothing unclean of itself; but to him who considers anything to be unclean, to him it is unclean.”

Many English translations render the Greek word koinos as “unclean,” but this translation introduces confusion. In Greek, koinos means “common”, not “unclean.” The actual Greek word for “unclean” is akathartos. These two words have distinct meanings, particularly in the Jewish context.

In Acts 10:14, Peter says:
“No, Lord; for I have never eaten anything common (koinos) or unclean (akathartos).”
Clearly, the New Testament distinguishes between “common” and “unclean,” as both words appear side by side. This distinction is crucial for understanding Romans 14.

• Akathartos refers to animals that are biblically forbidden (e.g., pigs, shellfish).
• Koinos refers to clean foods that have become ritually defiled—often because they have been handled or prepared by Gentiles or offered to idols.

This distinction is central to interpreting Romans 14. Paul is not addressing clean versus unclean animals, but rather clean foods that are labeled common by tradition, not Scripture.

The First-Century Context: Temple Marketplaces and Food Sacrificed to Idols

In the first-century Roman world, meat markets were often located near pagan temples, where animals sacrificed to idols were later sold as food. This posed a dilemma for believers: could they eat meat without knowing its connection to idolatry?

Paul addresses this in 1 Corinthians 8 and 10, teaching that while idols are nothing, believers should avoid eating meat sacrificed to idols if it causes a weaker brother to stumble. If the stronger believer’s knowledge leads them to eat freely, it must still be tempered by love and concern for the weaker brother’s conscience.

The same issue appears in Romans 14. Paul is not debating whether pork or shrimp are now acceptable, but is dealing with whether it is permissible for believers to eat clean meat that might have been prepared by Gentiles or possibly offered to idols.

Jewish tradition often viewed even clean animals as “common” if they were not slaughtered in the correct way or if they were touched by Gentiles. For example, a Passover lamb had to be slaughtered by a priest to be considered kosher. If a Gentile followed the same procedure, the lamb would still be regarded as “common,” not “unclean.”

When Paul says, “There is nothing koinos of itself,” he is reinforcing that God’s designation of clean animals remains valid, regardless of rabbinic traditions.

Love Over Liberty: A Call for Maturity

Paul ends Romans 14 with the following warning:
“Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All things indeed are clean, but they are evil for the man who eats with offense” (v. 20).

Here, Paul intentionally uses katharos, the Greek word for “clean,” to affirm that the foods God has declared clean are still clean. The distinction between koinos (common) and katharos (clean) is important in understanding Paul’s message.

However, Paul’s central concern is love. Even if believers know they have the freedom to eat certain foods, they should refrain if doing so causes a fellow believer to stumble. This is a principle of unity and respect, ensuring that one’s freedom does not lead another to violate their conscience.

Summary: What Romans 14 Is—and Is Not—Saying

• Paul is not negating the biblical dietary laws. He addresses the cultural and religious issue of common (koinos) foods, not the scriptural definition of clean versus unclean animals.
• The debate is about the source and preparation of clean food—not about whether pigs or shellfish are clean.
• “Unclean” (akathartos) refers to animals prohibited by Scripture.
• “Common” (koinos) refers to clean foods defiled by traditions or circumstances.
• Paul’s concern is relational, not nutritional. The focus is on maturity, love, and unity, not asserting one’s rights.

In essence, Romans 14 calls believers to live by conscience and grace. It encourages mature believers to exercise liberty with humility and respect, recognizing that the kingdom of God is much larger than our dietary preferences and convictions. Paul reminds us that God’s Word—His Torah—overrides human traditions, and no idol or false religion can make impure what God has declared clean.

Watch the full teaching here:
https://youtu.be/Y5keDD9fGRM

Full Teaching Transcript: